Analysis of Gordon Browns Leadership

Analysis of Gordon embrowns attractershipGordon brownness with his government activity of all the talents and his sh forbidden out to listen suggests he prefers a locker trope of organisation over Prime ministerial regime.What has been his record to date in exercising his prime ministerial antecedents? Illust aim with savoir-faire to the practice of the knightly three Prime Ministers and decide whether it is a decreed or negative development.IntroductionUpon becoming Prime Minister in June 2007, Gordon brownness gave fuddlight-emitting diode indications that he would change the political culture in Britain. Among those promises, he pledged to govern with a government of all the talents, findking consultation and advice from outside the traditional dig out Party sources. (BBC, 2007) Since then, the Prime Minister has also stated his preference for a much cabinet form of Government as opposed to a strong Prime Ministerial Government common in the Blair and Thatcher pe riods. (Rentoul, p552) Does Gordon browneds record show a preference for consultation, has Parliament been given more(prenominal) power in the running of Government or has Gordon Brown reverted to the strong autocratic appearance of leadership that he was often accused of during his time as chancellor?This essay will examine Gordon Browns short reign as Prime Minister, looking closely at his use of Prime Ministerial powers in Government. The work will explore the extent to which the present Labour locker has strong influence over decisions and policies, and whether Gordon Brown has strengthened Parliament by transferring some of the traditional Prime Ministerial powers to the legislature. In order to judge Gordon Browns record, it is necessary to compare the actions and records of the preliminary three UK Prime Ministers, Tony Blair, rear end major and Margaret Thatcher. Each Prime Minister differed in their use of Prime Ministerial powers, influenced by the political situat ion and their own style and personality. By gravid strong examples of cabinet or Prime Ministerial Government we may better understand their meaning, as swell up as better judging Gordon Browns record and style of Government. Finally we shall attempt to conclude whether Gordon Brown has brought almost a more Cabinet form of Government, and if so, judge if this has been a positive or negative development for Government and the Country.Chapter OneIn Gordon Browns first address to the House of Commons as Prime Minister, he indicated that his Premiership was one that would increase the power of Parliament in such vital areas as declaring war, signing Inter field of study treaties and approving public appointments. This was part of his plan to turn back power, which included proposals to start de-centralising power across the UK, al showtimeing UK citizens and councils more influence in Government. The Prime Minister has in some ways delivered on some of his promises to discover w ith a government of all the talents appointing Labour outsiders such as Sir Digby Jones and setting up the National Economic Council. (Bagehot, 2008) These actions however, do not necessarily mean that Gordon Brown has brought in a new period of cabinet Government however. Cabinet Government refers to the UK Prime Minister ruling in conjunction with his or her Cabinet, share responsibility and power but stay first among equals. Prime Ministerial Government refers to the Prime Minister dominating the executive, making all the major insurance policy decisions without always consulting with or taking the advice of the Cabinet. (Jones, 2005, p.27) Does Gordon Browns record suggest that he rules in co-operation with his Cabinet or does he make the major decisions without their region?The first few months of the Brown era were a relative success for the Government. The change of leader helped Labour recover public support, and Gordon Brown gave a prospering image as a strong and bear d leader. Policies were put forward to restore Cabinet Government, the party was united and the PM appears to take a shit consulted the Cabinet whilst remaining firmly in control. This was a change from the Blair period of Government, in which a strong Prime Ministerial form of Leadership existed, with outside unelected advisors exercising more power and influence on the PM than the elected Cabinet members. (Rentoul, 2001, p.536) Although the strong leadership of Blair and the unity of the party had been in many ways responsible for their electoral success, Blairs weakening of Cabinet power and autocratic leadership led Britain into an un common and, for the Labour parties popularity, disastrous war in Iraq.Gordon Brown entered office with the promise of restoring Cabinets importance, and lessening the influence of outsiders such as Alistair Campbell, who during the Blair years appeared to be the real deputy Leader, alternatively than the elected John Prescott. (Stephens, 2004, p .180) Brown then, seemed to be promoting a style of Government personified by John Major. During Majors time as PM Cabinet meetings were transformed from meetings where Mrs Thatcher would inform the cabinet of her policies and demand obedience into genuine forums for compete and deliberation. Important issues were discussed, free debate was encouraged and arguments were common. This was extremely popular within Government, as suggested in Dick Leonards A Century of Premiers. Major has restored Cabinet Government (Leonard, 2005, p.333)In the first few months, Gordon Brown did successfully lead in a Cabinet style of Government. The aftermath and response to several failed terrorist attacks were handled by Cabinet figures such as Jacqui Smith, who liaised with the public and the Muslim Community. In both the crisis with Northern Rock and the flooding in rural areas Brown employed the full talents of his Ministers rather than attempting to micromanage every situation. (Freedland, 2007) Brown was popular with both the party and the public it seemed that the return of Cabinet Government was beneficial for the Government and the Nation.In many ways Major and Brown inherited the Leadership under similar situations. Neither man had the commanding Parliamentary majority of Thatcher or Blair at their peak, and had to by necessity avow more on the support of their Cabinet. (Foley, 2002, p.33) Like Major, Brown has also had to deal with a resurgent opposite word which for the first time in years appears to be leading in the caps. This led to Browns first major crisis in September and October 2007 Brown hinted that he would call an election to fully legitimize his Leadership, as he did not face a leadership election to become Prime Minister. However Brown decided not to go ahead with an election, with many suggesting that he was worried by the Tories lead in the opinion polls. (Robinson, 2007) From this point on Brown became steadily less popular with the Country and t he party, as subsequent crises and Browns apparent lack of charisma and leadership chipping away at support for the Government. in spite of this however, many would suggest that this has not caused Gordon Brown to devastate Cabinet Government. On the contrary, Gordon Brown has continued to consult and debate with his Cabinet on the major issues, allowing such figures as David Milliband and Jacqui Smith to emerge as contingent future leaders of the Labour Party. Although Gordon Brown has consulted with many outside forces and attempted to build a more consensual form of British politics, even oblation Paddy Ashdown a position in Government, (Woodward, 2007) this has not led to the marginalisation of the Cabinet. Margaret Thatchers preference for unelected advisors, such as Sir Alan Walters, over Cabinet Members helped bring about her downfall, making her believe she was infallible and isolating potentially loyal Ministers, as suggested by Leonard. She acted as a virtual dictator, reducing the role of the Cabinet to that of a supporters club. (Leonard, 2005, p.313) It did however, give Thatcher the image of a strong Leader, one that could make important decisions decisively without having to consult or procrastinate. Unfortunately some of the decisions she made without consulting the Cabinet, such as the poll tax were disastrous for her and the Tory Party.Tony Blair did not marginalise or reduce his Cabinet to such a lowly level however he did, as we arrive mentioned, surround himself with an inner circle of advisors, many of them outsiders like Alistair Campbell, and relied more heavily on their advice than that of his Cabinet. His style of leadership was also similar to Thatchers in that he tried to dominate and manage every important situation, with the notable exception of those issues that came under his Chancellors office. (Rentoul, 2001, p.249) Although the most successful Labour leader in history, Blairs decisions and style of leadership were ultima tely responsible for his clearly begrudging resignation. Despite following a more Cabinet orientated approach to Government, Gordon Brown has erect that this does not necessarily guarantee loyalty during fractious times. There have been widespread rumours about a possible leadership challenge, with many Labour mononuclear phagocyte system talking to the press about their desire to see Gordon Brown step down. By giving his Cabinet power and responsibility Gordon Brown has allowed some of the big personalities, such as Milliband, to grow in status, so much so that many Labour MPs considered him a possible replacement.Chapter TwoIn our previous chapter we presented the argument that Gordon Brown has brought back a more Cabinet orientated form of Government. In Chapter two we will look at ways in which Gordon Brown has in fact maintained a Prime Ministerial form of Leadership, along with the negative consequences this has brought about. We will also attempt to evaluate Gordon Browns record, and come to a conclusion whether it has been a positive or negative development in relation to the three previous Prime Ministers reigns.At the beginning of Browns premiership, the Prime Minister made pledges to bring about more Parliamentary powers and increase executive accountability, a clear reference to Tony Blairs decision to launch an unpopular war. (Stephens, 2005, p239) However so remote, these pledges have remained in the formation stage. The Premier still retains ultimate authority on issues of national security, international treaties and appointments. Perhaps in the future these pledges will be passed in Parliament, however till that day the Prime Minister will retain a large degree of executive control. Since Brown has been in office little legislation actually transferring power away from the Executive has passed through Parliament.In many respects Brown has pushed through his own agenda, bypassing the reservations or objections of his Cabinet, as well as rut hlessly disposing of any Ministers that have dared to challenge his authority. (Bagehot, 2008) The ten pence tax rate cut was widely criticised by the media and opposition, and eventually forced the Government to backtrack. It was introduced in the 2007 budget by Brown, who insisted on implementing it despite the fact that it hit those on low incomes, natural Labour supporters. This disaster was a direct result of Gordon Brown forcing an unpopular policy into being despite the opposition of many in the Party.Despite the large size of the Cabinet, the Prime Minister has ensured that those in the top jobs are those with a proven track record for loyally supporting Brown throughout his years as Chancellor. Those supporters or suspected supporters of Tony Blair have largely been marginalised, not allowed near the more important Ministerial positions. Those Ministers who have resisted his policies or have mouth for the need of a new leader have been dropped for more loyal, pliant person nel. (Helm, 2008)) In the most important sphere of influence, the economy, the Chancellor Alistair Darling appears to operate with far less independence and power than Brown did under Blair, indeed although we may say that Tony Blair operated a Presidential style of Leadership, he went out of his way to continue his Chancellor. Gordon Brown does not have any figure powerful or independent enough to build a sphere of influence within Government as Brown did previously. (Leonard, 2005, p355-358) Regardless of the press and several Labour MPs promotion of David Milliband, Brown remains without peer in terms of gravitas, influence and experience within the party.Despite his smaller majority, Brown has also shown that he is able to force unpopular legislation through Parliamentary and Cabinet opposition, most notably in the case of the 42 day detention issue. The intense opposition in his Party, with alleged deals being made to get the bill passed, along with opposition condemnation sug gests that Gordon Brown was not concerned with giving Parliament new powers related to national security. In relation to Iraq although some British troops have been pulled out of the Country, British troops remain in both Iraq and Afghanistan, again despite the opposition of many in the party. That in that respect is no opposition in the Cabinet is perhaps testament to the loyalty of those Gordon Brown has chosen, rather than there being complete unity.Developments in the Brown Government Positive or blackball?In the last Chapter we have demonstrated that the Brown Leadership is not yet a perfect example of Cabinet Government. The Cabinet consists mainly of Brown loyalists, the Prime Minister has forced through many unpopular policies and as of yet has failed to deliver the legislation that would make a Cabinet Government a long term possibility. However despite these criticisms Gordon Brown has run a more Cabinet Government than either Tony Blair or Margaret Thatcher. It will be difficult for the Prime Minister to backtrack on legislation that will give more power to Parliament, and he has demonstrated in many of the crises that he is unforced to share power and responsibility with the more senior Cabinet members. The large size and broad range of the Cabinet also suggests that Brown is less seeming to rely on a small clique of outsiders for advice, as did Thatcher and Blair. In recent months Brown has also shown that he is willing to accept Blair loyalists into the Cabinet, as we have seen with the appointment of Peter Mandelson. (Sparrow, 2008)It is the opinion of this essay that despite the serious problems of the Labour Party this has been a positive development. Although there has been limited use of the talents of opposition party personnel, a Government of all the talents has the potential to change the confrontational, winner takes all style of British Politics. In a time of severe economic crisis there is a need to take advantage of all available talent and ability. History has shown that although a strong Prime Ministerial Government can be initially popular, if the Leader believes it is unnecessary to consult with their Cabinet then they can make serious errors of judgement. If Margaret Thatcher had listened to her Cabinet perhaps there would have been no poll tax, nor would relations with Europe be so damaged by Thatchers strident anti European speeches. (Riddell, 1991, pp.184-187)Ultimately though, a more Cabinet form of Government means a more democratic, accountable Government, one that is more likely to grant Parliament a greater role in the more important aspects of Government. A larger Cabinet made up of representatives from across the board is also more representative of the nation itself. If ideas and policies can be discussed, deliberated and argued out by a professional, representative and broad Cabinet then perhaps there will be less chance of the Government enacting policies that are popular and logical only to the Prime Minister and a close circle of unrepresentative outsiders.ConclusionThis essay has demonstrated that since taking office Gordon Brown has led a Cabinet Government similar to that of John Major, rather than the more Prime Ministerial approach of both Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. The essay has also shown that Browns leadership style does still contain elements of the Prime Ministerial form of Government, especially in regards to forcing through unpopular pet projects originating from when Brown was Chancellor. However, despite his constitution as a Stalinist leader Brown has shown surprising flexibility, an ability to consult with those outside the traditional Labour party sphere as well as demonstrating trust in the more senior members of his Cabinet.If Brown remains Prime Minister for the foreseeable future then we are likely to see legislation that will strengthen both Cabinet Government and Parliament itself. In the new economic climate and looming recession the se policies might herald a new age of not only Cabinet Government, but a more consensual and cross party form of British Politics. The emergence of a Cabinet Government is undoubtedly then a positive sign for the future.BibliographyFoley, Michael John Major, Tony Blair and a Conflict of leadership Collision Course (Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, 2002)Jones, amount Politics UK (Harlow, Pearson, Longman, London, 2006)Leonard, Dick A Century of Premiers From Salisbury to Blair (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005)Rentoul, John Tony Blair Prime Minister (Time Warner, London, 2001)Riddell, Peter The Thatcher Era and its Legacy (Blackwell, Oxford UK and Cambridge USA, 1991)Stephens, Philip Tony Blair The making of a World Leader (Viking, New York, 2004) countersignpapersBagehot Gordon Browns Recovery A War on two Fronts Economist, 9/10/2008, p.27Helm, Toby Left Winger Cruddas in Think ice chest challenge Guardian, 12/10/2008Freedland, Jonathan Who is Gordon Bro wn? The New York Review of Books, Volume 54, Number 16, October 25 2007.Sparrow, Andrew Gordon Brown defends decision to bring Peter Mandelson back into government Guardian, 03/10/2008Woodward, Will Ashdown turns down job in Brown cabinet Guardian, 21/06/2007, p2InternetBrown is UKs New Prime Minister BBC News 27/06/2007, accessed 06/11/2008http//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6245682.stmRobinson, Nick Brown rules out Autumn Election BBC News 06/10/2007, accessed 06/11/2008http//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7031749.stm

Examples Of The Company Suffering From Bad Publicity

Examples Of The Company Suffering From Bad PublicityGreenpeace distributed an argumentative video on YouTube about Nestls source for palm oil for their products. The targeted product was the outfit Kat contain and the video play off the Kit Kat slogan Have a break, Have a Kit Kat. Greenpeace said that Nestls source have a dirty hands in ruining a rainforests which were natural habits for orangutans. Furthermore, Greenpeaces video also imitative Kit Kats commercial by starting by a bored office worker tearing paper for his boss for hours. He pulls out a Kit Kat bar and bites into it without noticing or caring that the Kit Kat is actually a bleeding orangutan finger, and leaks blood all over his face and keyboard. In this case, come on took a quick action removed the video. By today technology, there is still had a way to let YouTube user repost the video. The users started reposting the video all over the net income and the more internet users repost the video all over the internet , and the more videos is taken down, the more videos will added.*What is societys brand positioning?(March 2012)http//www. draw close.com/csv/nutrition/positionedproductsAfford fitted and nutritiousNestle targeted customer with products that are nutritious, cheaper and tasty. Popularly Positioned Products (PPPs) supply high nutritional value by affordable cost and in suitable formats to send the needs of well-nigh 3 billion lower-income consumers worldwide. Their current PPPs spread from culinary products to beverages, to dairy and biscuit with over 400 products are sold under some global brands such(prenominal) as Maggie and Nescafe.These actions bring 30-40% improvement in market penetration within lower-income customers in the last 2 years and increase distribution of Maggie noodles by crusade about affordability and hygienic messages.* Provide some information about a recent marketing campaign.http//www.networkworld.com/community/blog/marketing-gone-wild-candy-bars-stalk-you Nestle company throw a promotion called We will find you that find by GPS trackers which the shape alike normal chocolate bars. When a winning customer opens the wrapper, it will activates and send a message to the prize team who tracking them down within 24 hours to deliver a check for 10,000. This chocolate product can find from KitKat Chunky, Yorkie Milk, KitKat 4 Finger and Aero Peppermint Medium.London showed off this video of Nestle using cutting edge geolocation technology to track down six lucky winners crossways the UK and Ireland. They believe that this promotion will particularly invoke to men, fascinating them to the chocolate singles category and thus driving increasing sales. Nestl Confectionery is delighted to be first to market with this highly innovative GPS for the promotion.During August 2010, Brazil was the first to use GPS, drop it into a product to track you and take marketing promotions to a whole new creepy yet innovative level.CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILI TYCorporate Social Responsibility is defined a concept which the company incorporate social and environmental concerns in business operations and interactions with stakeholders on voluntary basis.Does the company promote a positive impact through its activities on the environment, consumers, employees and communities?http//www.ukessays.co.uk/essays/communications/nestle.phpNestle shown great concern for the society though the launch of their concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in 2006, Creating Shared Value (CSR).after the launch of CSR, Nestle undertaken many projects to assistant the society. A great project that brought significant change to society is The Cocoa Plan project to facilitate African hot chocolate farmers and the society take advantage of setting market prices by growing their productivity. Nestle funded farmer schools in West Africa to learn better ways which able to produce higher quality cocoa and increase revenue. Not only that, Nestle built a developme nt and research centre that work in hand with Nestle plant science base. Nestle as a partner of International Cocoa Initiative and the World Cocoa foundation resolved problems, example child labour and lack of access of education and health such as send farmers to field schools educates the farmer the way to increase productivity and also educated of diseases and prevention ways. In this case, the increasing of income for those West African household enhance their lifestyles. Between that, the dramatically of boosting of production of cocoa increase their exports and conversely decrease their foreign owing. There are also can learn new skills, study the technology and share useful information among the locals who sent to work.http//businesscasestudies.co.uk/nestle/business-principles-in-action-nutritional-labelling/ethics-and-business-principles.htmlaxzz2L5lKmRxZNestle developed two business principles that focused on communications with consumers. One of the business principle is Nestle consumer communication should reflect moderation in food consumption and not encourage overeating especially important regarding children. Another one of the business principle is must combine the desire for healthy and balanced diets. Their advertising must not mean the reposition of meals with snack foods and heavy snacking. Nestle helps consumers recognize and understand the nutritional content of the food that they bought. This is a positive impact on the reputation of the company. Consumers can be know the Nestle behaving responsibly and communicating with them. They also facilitate and promote healthy life for their staffs. Nestle company linked to the Guideline Daily Amounts on the front of packs with the internal communication programme to tell staffs about GDAs and labeling system. In this case, it can help to motivate staffs as showed nestle cared about their well-being and their families.

The Development of Behavioral Psychology Essay -- science, J.R. Angell

The human mind and the way humans behave have been primitive topics of study amongst historians for many years. Studies have been conducted in different professional areas to gain knowledge and understanding of humans, in an attempt to control carriage. The study of human behavior is known as behavioral psychology or behaviorism. The goal of early behaviorists and functionalists was to bring about a more reliable psychology. The behaviorists believed they would achieve this goal by excluding self-examination and focus on the study of behaviorism. This evolution was achieved with help from the zeitgeist, behaviorist, and organizational psychology. This paper will discuss J.R. Angell and his prediction of the shift in psychology from introspection to behaviorism, the persons and ideas helped to carry out the shift, how the zeitgeist supported the shift, and how the development of industrial psychology played its part in the shift.On what did Angell base his opinion?J. R. Angell was a psychologist and educator, who studied under John Dewey and William James. Angell worked as a psychology instructor at the University of Minnesota. It was at this university that Angell formed a psychology department in 1905 (Schultz and Schultz, 2012, p.294). Schultz and Schultz (2008) wroteJ.R. Angell at the University of Chicago, perhaps the most progressive of the functional psychologists, predicted that American psychology was ready for greater objectivity. In 1910, he commented that it seemed possible that the term consciousness would disappear from psychology, a lot as the term soul had disappeared. (p. 293)Behaviorism, which contended to end structuralism without compromise, was underway when Angell made his 2008 statement. J.R. Angell is su... ...or individuals. ConclusionPsychology has grown from the founding of behaviorism. Many individuals and ideas played a plentiful part in setting the atmosphere for behaviorism to be widely accepted. Zeitgeist of that time period had also contributed to the acceptance of behaviorism. Therefore, when Watson came on the scene, it was not difficult for his ideas to be accepted. Even organizational psychology had its role by showing one can apply techniques in every aspect to bring change. Works CitedBuckley, K. W. (1989). mechanised Man John Broadus Watson and the Beginnings of Behaviorism. New York The Guilford pressGoss, A. E. (1961). Early behaviorism and verbal mediating responses. American psychologist, 16(6), 285-298.Schultz, D.P. & Schultz, S. E. (2012). A history of modern psychology, (10th Ed.) Belmont, CA Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

Bosnia-Hercegovina :: World History Essays

Bosnia-HercegovinaMissing Works CitedThe origin of the implements of war with the argent between 6 fleur-de-lys,which is now on the flag of the republic of Bosnia-Hercegovina, has longpuzzled me, tho they are in fact the arms of the Kotromanic family, whichruled Bosnia in the fourteenth and 1 5th centuries. Other arms have also beenattributed to Bosnia in the nineteenth century.I finally thought of a way to get at this question of the originof the current Bosnian flag numismatics, of course. I found a book by oneIvan Rengjeo, Corpus der mittel-alterlichen Mnnzen von Kroatien, Slavonien,Dalmatien und Bosnien, Graz, 1959, which is as exhaustive as you can geton the topic (coins from those regions, that is). I have also consulted an name by Pavao Andelic on Medieval Seals of Bosnia-Hercegovina, in themonograph series of the Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia-Hercegovina(Sarajevo, 1970),but it is in Serbo-Croat, so I can only look at the(numerous) illustra tions. What follows is a historical/heraldic account,pieced together from these sources, and a few encyclopedias. Bosnia wasdominated alternatively by Serbia and, from the 12th c. onward, by Croatia(in personal union with Hungary) until the early 14th c. Typically, the world-beater of Hungary and Croatia appointed bans, or local governors and, intypical medieval fashion, these bans took advantage of any weakness of thecentral monarchy to carve out territories for themselves.In the early 14th c., the ban of Croatia was Pavao (Paul) Subic ofBrebir or Breberio (a town in Dalmatia which was given to the family in1222) his father and grandfather were counts or Trau or Trogir, hiscousins were counts of Spalato or Split. This p owerful man titles himselfban of Croatia and dominee Bosniae, and appoints his brother Mladen ISubic (1302-04) and later his eldest son Mladen II (1312-14) as ban ofBosnia. His second son Georg was count of Trau and Split, his third sonPavao was count of Trau. By the third generation, howev er, the family hadlost its power. This first dynasty of bans issued byzantine-style coins,with no heraldry. Their seals, however, show the Subic arms an eagle wingdisplayed, and 5 flowers with stems as crest (mi sread by Siebmacher asostrich-feathers). The style of the arms is very German, with the shieldtilted to the left, a German helm, lambrequins, and a crest. There are notinctures, but a junior branch issued from Pavao count of Trau, the Subicde Zrin, bo re Gules, two wings sable (an interesting violation of the s-called tincture rule).

Buffalo Springfield :: folk-rock country-rock

Aside from the Byrds, the only other mass that had a tremendous influence on folk-rock and country-rock in the sixties was overawe Springfield. They were noted as a key impact upon the counter-culture of the sixties, and their music is symbolic of the turbulence and controversy that surfaced during harsh times of war. The groups formation was coincident and legendary. Stephen Stills and Richie Furay were driving on Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles in early April 1966, when by chance they pulled up behind a tattered black Pontiac hearse look Canada license plates. The car held Neil Young, a Canadian Stills had crossed paths with earlier, and Bruce Palmer, a bass player. The two were on search of their musical dreams when they fused with Stills and Furay, and began to work for status as a rock and roll band. Buffalo Springfield was soon signed with Atco Records, and began producing their self-titled debut album. This record contained the famous song, For What Its Worth, which trans cended pop charts to become an anthem for an undefiled generation. Their second album, Buffalo Springfield Again, achieved great acclaim for the powerful songs from Stills, Young, and Furay.Though Buffalo Springfield was established as the best folk-rock band in the sixties, the band was not intact for capacious. Even with the success that followed their popular albums, problems arose within the members of the group. Particularly, Stills and Young had stubborn, conflicting personalities. This lead to several rearrangements among members of the band. Young would often leave the group for long periods of time, while Palmer fought deportation.

Death at the Abattoir :: Slaughtering Pigs Personal Narrative Papers

Death at the AbattoirThe introductory time Professor Marx mentioned that we would be given the opportunity to witness a pig slaughtering, I immediately decided that I would do it. I chose the Abattoir because I wanted to be informed about the process. As I walked down the path to the Abattoir I tried not to think about what I was about to witness. after(prenominal) passing through the huge metal doors, stepping in the soap water to disinfect the bottom of my shoes, putting on the hair net, the apron, and hard hat, I entangle like I was about to walk on to the production floor of a large factory. The room was an obsessive-compulsive persons paradise. Everything was spotless and in top condition. On the ceiling were a series of wheels on rails that connected to hooks, which go the pigs from station to station. Other than an assortment of carts, a monstrous mechanism in one corner, four butchers, and an inspector, the room seemed empty.The pigs were kept outside the abattoir in a little pen area. The eldest butcher opened the door, and the first pig hobbled in on its arthritis-crippled legs to the first stage. The pig did not seem to have any idea what was going on as the butchers attached a chain to one of its hind legs. The pig was hoisted upside down, and the butcher punctured a gaping hole at the bottom of the pigs throat. note immediately started gushing out. The pig barely struggled as its waning heart pumped out its blood onto the cement floor below. After the pig died, they moved it into a vat of steaming sweltry water for about ten minutes to help loosen the hair from its skin. The carcass was then shifted onto a big contraption which removes most of the hair from the now lifeless body of the pig. The machine is a giant metal basket that literally shakes the hair from the pig. As the pig violently rolled over and over, it resembled a hamster whose wheel had not stopped turning after it died. I was taking a few steps bet on to e scape the hair that was flying off the pig, when my finger brushed against burning hot metal. I looked down and saw a small tub of hot water that I later observed the butchers used to sanitize their knives in between slaughters.

Essay --

STATEMENTOF PURPOSEThe real secret of success is enthusiasm-Walter ChryslerThis is Sneha Vynathi Garaga, pursuing final year of under-graduation from Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology (www.kmit.in) in Electronics and intercourse Engineering. It is with great incitement and warmth that I write this personnel statement to discuss my academics and motivation for pursuing graduate studies.In my schooling, after identifying my diligence in academics, I was selected to attend five-day 58th International Astronautical congress (IAC) held at Hi-tech city, Hyderabad. I was inspired immensely by the speech given by Sunita Williams and it was, indeed, a huge source of inspiration for me to pursue my career in the field of technology.Following this motivation, I opted for Electronics and Communication Engineering as my under-graduate major. Though my major in under-graduation is electronics, I am applying for Masters study in Computer science. I joined my under-graduate college with inter est towards electronics however, later I realized that I encounter a great inclination towards c...